So why did the farmer ‘go back to the start’? What is sustainable agriculture?
According to sustainabletable.org
Sustainable agriculture is a way of raising food that is healthy for consumers and animals, does not harm the environment, is humane for workers, respects animals, provides a fair wage to the farmer, and supports and enhances rural communities.
A short introduction by National Geographic:
Sustainable agriculture takes many forms, but at its core is a rejection of the industrial approach to food production developed during the 20th century.
This system, with its reliance on monoculture, mechanization, chemical pesticides and fertilizers, biotechnology, and government subsidies, has made food abundant and affordable. However, the ecological and social price has been steep: erosion; depleted and contaminated soil and water resources; loss of biodiversity; deforestation; labor abuses; and the decline of the family farm.
The concept of sustainable agriculture embraces a wide range of techniques, including organic, free-range, low-input, holistic, and biodynamic.
The common thread among these methods is an embrace of farming practices that mimic natural ecological processes. Farmers minimize tilling and water use; encourage healthy soil by planting fields with different crops year after year and integrating croplands with livestock grazing; and avoid pesticide use by nurturing the presence of organisms that control crop-destroying pests.
Beyond growing food, the philosophy of sustainability also espouses broader principles that support the just treatment of farm workers and food pricing that provides the farmer with a livable income.
Critics of sustainable agriculture claim, among other things, that its methods result in lower crop yields and higher land use. They add that a wholesale commitment to its practices will mean inevitable food shortages for a world population expected to exceed 8 billion by the year 2030. There’s recent evidence, though, suggesting that over time, sustainably farmed lands can be as productive as conventional industrial farms.
Of course, no issue is without its debates.
Dennis Avery, sustainable agriculture’s most vocal critic, writes about how high-yield farming saves nature. Norman Borlaug also wrote in 2002 how high-yield farming is critical to food needs of a booming population.
On the other side, advocates have gone to some lengths to dispute the claims of proponents of high-yield agriculture. Hal Hamilton argues that sustainable agriculture can be high-yield, EAP disputes the evidence of critics of sustainable agriculture, and John Ikerd more directly highlights the fantastical nature of Dennis Avery’s arguments.